What Is Proxy Betting? How It Works, Legal Risks and Sportsbook Rules

Proxy Bet

Proxy betting means that one person places a sports bet for someone else. The person behind the bet may choose the wager, provide the money and expect to receive any winnings, while another person actually places it.

For example, Alex gives Sam $100 and asks him to bet on Team A at a sportsbook. Sam places the wager, but Alex expects the winnings if it succeeds. This is a basic form of proxy betting.

Not every arrangement works the same way. An unpaid bet for a friend, paid messenger betting, using another person's online account and using your own account for somebody else's wagers can raise different legal and sportsbook-rule issues.

For this guide, I focus on the United States and the United Kingdom. I chose the US because sports betting is regulated mainly at the state level, which lets me compare different approaches to proxy betting within one country. The United Kingdom provides a different model: a mature national betting market with central regulation and detailed account rules from major licensed sportsbooks.

I checked proxy-betting rules across every US jurisdiction with a legal sports betting market and reviewed the terms of major sportsbooks in both markets.

This guide is for general information and is not legal advice.

Common Arrangements Often Called Proxy Betting

The term proxy betting is used for several practices that are not exactly the same.

Tennessee's sports betting regulator, for example, defines proxy betting as one person betting on behalf of another.

I separate the most common arrangements like this:

Arrangement What happens Main issue
Unpaid retail bet for another person Someone takes another person's money and instructions to a sportsbook Some jurisdictions distinguish this from paid messenger betting
Paid messenger betting A person receives money or another benefit for placing wagers for somebody else Some states specifically regulate or prohibit compensated betting messengers
Using another person's betting account Someone logs into an account registered to another customer Identity, account security and sportsbook terms
Using your own account for someone else's bets You place another person's wagers through an account in your name The account may be restricted to your own personal betting
Using a proxy to bypass a restriction Another person is used after self-exclusion, an account restriction or a location restriction Compliance and player-protection controls may be bypassed

There can also be narrow approved exceptions. Some sportsbooks have formal procedures that allow assistance for customers with certain disabilities. I would not treat these arrangements as ordinary proxy betting.

Retail and online betting create different issues. At a betting shop, proxy betting may involve passing money and instructions to another person. Online sportsbooks link each wager to a registered account and may check identity, age, payment details, device information and location.

Password sharing is therefore not the only potential problem. Using your own account to place another person's bets can also conflict with rules that require wagers to be made for your own benefit.

There is no single legal answer that applies to every form of proxy betting.

The result depends on the jurisdiction and the type of arrangement. Some rules directly prohibit betting on behalf of another person. Others cover only specific cases, such as paid messenger betting, wagering for a prohibited person or using another person's account.

I use five classifications in the table:

  • Explicit rule against proxy betting – a law or regulation directly prohibits proxy or agent wagering, or requires sportsbooks to prevent it.
  • Limited restriction – the rule applies only to certain forms, such as paid messenger betting or wagering for a prohibited person.
  • Official sportsbook restriction – the state's official betting system restricts the practice through sportsbook or account rules rather than a separate broad proxy-betting law.
  • Varies by tribal sportsbook – there is no single statewide commercial rule that applies to every tribal sportsbook.
  • No explicit statewide rule found – I could not verify a current broad proxy-specific statewide rule. This does not mean proxy betting is allowed.
State Proxy Betting Rule What I Found
Arizona Explicit rule against proxy betting Arizona's wagering framework treats people acting as agents or proxies as prohibited participants. The same approach appears in the state's tribal sports-wagering framework.
Arkansas Limited restriction Arkansas rules define a messenger bettor as someone who wagers for another person for compensation. Sportsbooks must not knowingly accept such bets.
Colorado Explicit rule against proxy betting Colorado rules prohibit betting as an agent or proxy for another person, subject to limited approved exceptions in specific contexts.
Connecticut Explicit rule against proxy betting Connecticut law requires a person to place a wager on their own behalf and prohibits sportsbooks from knowingly accepting a wager placed for another person.
Delaware Official sportsbook restriction Delaware's official sports betting system treats wagers as personal and restricts bets made for other people or through another person's account.
Florida Explicit rule against proxy betting Florida's tribal sports-wagering framework requires controls against people wagering as agents or proxies for another person.
Illinois Limited restriction Illinois expressly restricts betting on behalf of a third party when that third party is prohibited from wagering. I did not find an equally clear blanket statewide prohibition covering every eligible bettor.
Indiana Explicit rule against proxy betting Indiana includes a person wagering as an agent or proxy among prohibited sports-wagering participants.
Iowa No explicit statewide rule found Iowa lawmakers have considered legislation specifically targeting proxy betting, but I did not find a current enacted blanket prohibition matching that proposal.
Kansas Explicit rule against proxy betting Kansas law prohibits knowingly placing a sports wager as an agent or proxy for another person. The offence can carry criminal penalties.
Kentucky Explicit rule against proxy betting Kentucky sportsbook controls must include procedures designed to prevent people from placing wagers as agents or proxies for others.
Louisiana Limited restriction Louisiana law specifically prohibits a prohibited bettor from using another person to place wagers and prohibits others from facilitating such betting.
Maine Explicit rule against proxy betting Maine law prohibits an operator from accepting a wager from someone acting on behalf of, or as an agent or custodian for, another person.
Maryland Limited restriction Under current Maryland regulations, a sportsbook may not accept a wager it knew or should have known was placed on behalf of, or for the benefit of, a person prohibited from sports wagering. The rule does not create a blanket prohibition covering every wager placed for another eligible bettor.
Massachusetts Explicit rule against proxy betting Massachusetts law requires operators to use reasonable methods to stop people from wagering as agents or proxies for others.
Michigan Explicit rule against proxy betting Michigan's internet sports betting rules include people wagering on behalf of another person among prohibited participants.
Mississippi Limited restriction Mississippi Gaming Commission rules bar sportsbooks from knowingly accepting a wager when a person is betting for another for compensation. I did not find an equivalent blanket rule covering every unpaid proxy wager.
Missouri Explicit rule against proxy betting Missouri's sports wagering rules state that an individual may not place a wager on behalf of another person.
Montana Official sportsbook restriction Montana Lottery's official sports betting rules restrict a person from wagering on the account of, or for, another person.
Nebraska Explicit rule against proxy betting Nebraska law includes a person placing a sports wager as an agent or proxy among prohibited participants.
Nevada Limited restriction Nevada law contains an exception for certain wagers placed without compensation for the benefit of another person, while Nevada Gaming Regulation 22 treats compensated messenger betting separately.
New Hampshire Limited restriction New Hampshire expressly covers people acting as agents or proxies for prohibited sports bettors. The rule is narrower than a blanket ban covering every eligible bettor.
New Jersey Explicit rule against proxy betting New Jersey rules prohibit sportsbooks from knowingly accepting wagers made on behalf of another person or through another person's account.
New Mexico Varies by tribal sportsbook Sports betting is offered through tribal gaming rather than one statewide commercial sportsbook system. The New Mexico Gaming Control Board explains that Tribal Gaming Agencies regulate tribal casino operations. I found no uniform public proxy rule applying to every tribal sportsbook.
New York Explicit rule against proxy betting New York's sports wagering framework includes people betting as agents or proxies among prohibited participants.
North Carolina Explicit rule against proxy betting North Carolina's current rules define an individual wagering on behalf of another individual or person as an Ineligible Person. Operators must use reasonable measures to prevent Ineligible Persons from wagering.
North Dakota Varies by tribal sportsbook Sports betting operates through tribal casinos. Dakota Nation Sportsbook, for example, expressly prohibits a person from placing wagers or collecting winnings as an agent or proxy. That rule should not be applied automatically to every tribal sportsbook in the state.
Ohio Explicit rule against proxy betting Ohio law requires sportsbook operators to use reasonable methods to prevent people from wagering on behalf of another person.
Oregon Official sportsbook restriction The Oregon Lottery offers sports betting through DraftKings. The Oregon-specific DraftKings terms prohibit another person from using the account and restrict using a single account on behalf of multiple entrants.
Pennsylvania Explicit rule against proxy betting Pennsylvania's sports wagering rules expressly cover wagers made on behalf of another person and other forms of proxy wagering.
Rhode Island Official sportsbook restriction Rhode Island Lottery rules state that wagers are accepted from the player placing them, not on behalf of another person or entity. I would not turn this wording into a claim that every proxy wager is separately criminalised.
South Dakota Explicit rule against proxy betting South Dakota law prohibits sportsbooks from accepting wagers from agents or proxies for other people. Violations can carry criminal penalties.
Tennessee Explicit rule against proxy betting The Tennessee Sports Wagering Council states directly that betting on behalf of another person is illegal in Tennessee.
Vermont Limited restriction Vermont law includes a person acting as an agent or proxy for a prohibited sports bettor among prohibited participants.
Virginia Explicit rule against proxy betting Virginia requires operators to take reasonable measures to prevent one sports bettor from acting as a proxy for another.
Washington Explicit rule against proxy betting Washington's tribal sports-wagering framework includes people wagering as agents or proxies among prohibited participants.
West Virginia Explicit rule against proxy betting West Virginia regulations include people attempting to wager as agents or proxies among prohibited sports-pool participants.
Wisconsin Varies by tribal sportsbook Wisconsin's Department of Administration says legal sports betting is limited to tribal gaming authorised under compacts. Individual tribal sportsbook rules apply. Potawatomi Sportsbook, for example, expressly prohibits wagering as an agent or proxy.
Wyoming Explicit rule against proxy betting Wyoming's sports wagering rules prohibit people from wagering on behalf of another person.
Washington, D.C. Explicit rule against proxy betting D.C. law requires operators to use reasonable methods to prevent individuals or groups from wagering as agents or proxies for others.

The table shows why I do not use a simple legal-or-illegal classification. Nevada is the clearest example. Under NRS 465.094, certain wagers placed without compensation for another person's benefit can fall within an exception. Nevada Gaming Regulation 22 treats compensated messenger betting separately.

The consequences can also go beyond sportsbook account action. Kansas and South Dakota attach criminal penalties to certain forms of proxy wagering, while Tennessee expressly states that betting on behalf of another person is illegal.

New Jersey also shows that proxy-betting rules are enforced against operators. In February 2022, the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement imposed a $150,000 civil penalty on DraftKings after finding that the operator had negligently allowed a patron to engage in proxy wagering. The enforcement summary and official order provide the details.

Proxy Betting in the UK

There is no general rule in the UK that prohibits every case of one person placing a bet for another. The legal position changes when the arrangement becomes a service or involves other regulated activity.

Under Section 13 of the Gambling Act 2005, a person who provides a service designed to facilitate bets between other people can be treated as a betting intermediary. The UK Gambling Commission explains that this can include a tipster who places bets for third parties in return for payment or commission. The appropriate operating licence is required for this type of business.

Online accounts are also subject to regulatory controls. UK-licensed remote operators must identify their customers, and the Gambling Commission warns against giving personal details to third parties for gambling accounts, particularly where this could bypass age checks, self-exclusion or other restrictions.

Sportsbooks can then impose additional account rules. I compare the terms of four major British operators below.

Sportsbook Rules Add a Second Layer

Gambling rules are only one part of the picture. Sportsbooks also set their own account rules. Even where I found no broad legal ban on every form of proxy betting, an operator may still require the registered customer to place only their own bets.

Proxy betting can affect several controls used by sportsbooks:

Control Why Proxy Betting Can Create a Problem
Identity and age checks The person behind the wager may not be the verified customer
Location checks The real bettor and the person placing the wager may be in different jurisdictions
Self-exclusion An excluded person may try to continue gambling through someone else
Source of funds Money used through the account may belong to another person
Account security Someone other than the registered customer may access or control the account
Sports integrity A restricted or prohibited person may try to place wagers through another bettor

How US Sportsbooks Treat Betting for Someone Else

I checked official material from four major US sportsbooks.

Because operator terms can differ by state, the source checked matters.

Sportsbook Source Checked What the Rule or Policy Says
DraftKings Pennsylvania Terms of Use Another person cannot access or use the account. The terms also cover placing a bet through the service on behalf of another individual.
FanDuel Identity-verification policy FanDuel says it monitors for possible underage and proxy betting and can close accounts when prohibited activity is identified.
Caesars Sportsbook Pennsylvania terms Caesars includes proxy wagering among conduct that can lead to account action.
bet365 US Terms and Conditions The account must be used for the customer's own personal betting. The terms restrict using an account for the benefit of or on behalf of a third party.

The wording differs between operators. DraftKings directly covers wagers placed on behalf of another person, while FanDuel also describes proxy betting as activity it monitors.

I therefore checked terms for broader phrases such as personal use, third-party benefit and acting on behalf of another person, not only the word proxy.

Some operators also have narrow approved exceptions. Caesars' Massachusetts rules, for example, describe a formal process for assistance for certain customers with disabilities. The bettor must be present and the procedure must be approved. I would not treat this as ordinary proxy betting.

How Great Britain Sportsbooks Treat Betting for Someone Else

I checked four large sports betting sites in the UK.

Sportsbook What the Terms Say
William Hill The account is for the customer's own personal use. Another person cannot use or deposit into it. The terms also restrict money provided by another person when it is used to bypass restrictions or suspension on that person's account.
bet365 An account cannot be used for the benefit of or on behalf of a third party. Customers also cannot allow another person to use the account, apart from limited operator-approved assistance.
Sky Bet Bets through the account must be for the customer's own benefit unless Sky Bet has agreed otherwise in advance.
Paddy Power Customers confirm that the account is for personal use and that they will not act on behalf of a third party. Accounts cannot be sold or transferred.

William Hill also shows that proxy-betting rules can apply without password sharing, because its terms cover certain third-party funds used to bypass account restrictions.

What Can Happen If Proxy Betting Is Detected?

There is no universal penalty. The response depends on the sportsbook's terms, the jurisdiction and what the operator believes happened.

Possible Action What It Can Mean
Account review The sportsbook may request more identity, payment or source-of-funds information
Temporary suspension The customer may lose access while the operator investigates
Bet cancellation Pending or affected wagers may be voided where the terms allow it
Account closure The operator may permanently terminate the account
Withholding relevant funds Some terms allow winnings linked to prohibited activity to be withheld in defined circumstances

DraftKings, William Hill and bet365 publish terms allowing some of these actions, although the exact conditions differ.

I would not assume that a sportsbook will automatically confiscate all winnings after suspected proxy betting. The outcome depends on the operator's terms and the facts of the case.

Proxy Betting and Self-Exclusion

Proxy betting can be used to bypass self-exclusion by hiding the excluded bettor behind another person.

There is evidence that this happens in real betting environments. A 2025 study of current and former UK betting-shop employees described situations where excluded customers could remain outside a shop and pass bets to another person going inside.

The study was qualitative and focused on betting shops, so I would not use it to estimate how common online proxy betting is. It does show a real way in which another person can be used to bypass an exclusion.

Broader research on self-exclusion systems has also identified breaches and circumvention as problems that regulators and operators need to address.

I would not treat betting through another person as an alternative to self-exclusion. It removes part of the protection that self-exclusion is designed to provide.

Final Thoughts

Proxy betting is not one single practice with one legal answer. An unpaid bet for another person, paid messenger betting and using someone else’s sportsbook account can be treated differently depending on the jurisdiction and the circumstances.

The rules I reviewed in the US and the UK also show that gambling law is only part of the picture. Sportsbooks can impose their own account restrictions, including rules on third-party betting, account sharing and the source of funds.

Before placing a bet for someone else, I would check both the local rules and the sportsbook’s current terms. This is especially important when account restrictions, third-party funds or self-exclusion are involved.

Author
Bookmaker Reviewer

I started writing about sports betting in 2020. Since then, I have worked as a journalist, copywriter, and content manager in the betting industry, covering betting news, gambling rules, and sports content. I have also been making sports bets since 2012, mostly on football, Formula 1, and major Counter-Strike tournaments. My background combines professional work in betting media with long personal experience as a sports bettor.

Related articles

Granular Betting (1st Drive Result)

A granular bet is the type of wager you make after considering very specific, often-overlooked details to gain an edge and improve your chances of winning. Before placing this kind of bet, you conduct a detailed, granular analysis that focuses on advanced stats and situational factors that most casual punters tend to ignore. This concept isn’t exactly new, but recently it has become more common among serious punters, thanks to better access to real time data and advanced analytical tools.
Aug 2, 2025
Comments
(0)
No comment yet
No comment yet
ADD THE FIRST COMMENT
BetZillion
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Get even more!
Subscribe for early access
to forecasts and exclusive analytics
that are available only to our readers.
Thank you
for subscribing
An email has been sent to your inbox. To complete your subscription, please confirm your email. If you don’t see it in a few minutes, check your spam folder.

We wish you success and only winning predictions!
Oops!
Something
went wrong
Try again later or check
your internet connection.
You are already
with us!
Keep an eye out for new predictions and promotions in your inbox, and if you don't see our emails, please check your spam folder.
footballer