What Is Proxy Betting? How It Works, Legal Risks and Sportsbook Rules
Proxy betting means that one person places a sports bet for someone else. The person behind the bet may choose the wager, provide the money and expect to receive any winnings, while another person actually places it.
Get a summary in:
Not every arrangement works the same way. An unpaid bet for a friend, paid messenger betting, using another person's online account and using your own account for somebody else's wagers can raise different legal and sportsbook-rule issues.
For this guide, I focus on the United States and the United Kingdom. I chose the US because sports betting is regulated mainly at the state level, which lets me compare different approaches to proxy betting within one country. The United Kingdom provides a different model: a mature national betting market with central regulation and detailed account rules from major licensed sportsbooks.
I checked proxy-betting rules across every US jurisdiction with a legal sports betting market and reviewed the terms of major sportsbooks in both markets.
This guide is for general information and is not legal advice.
Common Arrangements Often Called Proxy Betting
The term proxy betting is used for several practices that are not exactly the same.
Tennessee's sports betting regulator, for example, defines proxy betting as one person betting on behalf of another.
I separate the most common arrangements like this:
| Arrangement | What happens | Main issue |
|---|---|---|
| Unpaid retail bet for another person | Someone takes another person's money and instructions to a sportsbook | Some jurisdictions distinguish this from paid messenger betting |
| Paid messenger betting | A person receives money or another benefit for placing wagers for somebody else | Some states specifically regulate or prohibit compensated betting messengers |
| Using another person's betting account | Someone logs into an account registered to another customer | Identity, account security and sportsbook terms |
| Using your own account for someone else's bets | You place another person's wagers through an account in your name | The account may be restricted to your own personal betting |
| Using a proxy to bypass a restriction | Another person is used after self-exclusion, an account restriction or a location restriction | Compliance and player-protection controls may be bypassed |
There can also be narrow approved exceptions. Some sportsbooks have formal procedures that allow assistance for customers with certain disabilities. I would not treat these arrangements as ordinary proxy betting.
Retail and online betting create different issues. At a betting shop, proxy betting may involve passing money and instructions to another person. Online sportsbooks link each wager to a registered account and may check identity, age, payment details, device information and location.
Password sharing is therefore not the only potential problem. Using your own account to place another person's bets can also conflict with rules that require wagers to be made for your own benefit.
Is Proxy Betting Legal?
There is no single legal answer that applies to every form of proxy betting.
The result depends on the jurisdiction and the type of arrangement. Some rules directly prohibit betting on behalf of another person. Others cover only specific cases, such as paid messenger betting, wagering for a prohibited person or using another person's account.
Proxy Betting Rules in US States With Legal Sports Betting
I use five classifications in the table:
- Explicit rule against proxy betting – a law or regulation directly prohibits proxy or agent wagering, or requires sportsbooks to prevent it.
- Limited restriction – the rule applies only to certain forms, such as paid messenger betting or wagering for a prohibited person.
- Official sportsbook restriction – the state's official betting system restricts the practice through sportsbook or account rules rather than a separate broad proxy-betting law.
- Varies by tribal sportsbook – there is no single statewide commercial rule that applies to every tribal sportsbook.
- No explicit statewide rule found – I could not verify a current broad proxy-specific statewide rule. This does not mean proxy betting is allowed.
| State | Proxy Betting Rule | What I Found |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Arizona's wagering framework treats people acting as agents or proxies as prohibited participants. The same approach appears in the state's tribal sports-wagering framework. |
| Arkansas | Limited restriction | Arkansas rules define a messenger bettor as someone who wagers for another person for compensation. Sportsbooks must not knowingly accept such bets. |
| Colorado | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Colorado rules prohibit betting as an agent or proxy for another person, subject to limited approved exceptions in specific contexts. |
| Connecticut | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Connecticut law requires a person to place a wager on their own behalf and prohibits sportsbooks from knowingly accepting a wager placed for another person. |
| Delaware | Official sportsbook restriction | Delaware's official sports betting system treats wagers as personal and restricts bets made for other people or through another person's account. |
| Florida | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Florida's tribal sports-wagering framework requires controls against people wagering as agents or proxies for another person. |
| Illinois | Limited restriction | Illinois expressly restricts betting on behalf of a third party when that third party is prohibited from wagering. I did not find an equally clear blanket statewide prohibition covering every eligible bettor. |
| Indiana | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Indiana includes a person wagering as an agent or proxy among prohibited sports-wagering participants. |
| Iowa | No explicit statewide rule found | Iowa lawmakers have considered legislation specifically targeting proxy betting, but I did not find a current enacted blanket prohibition matching that proposal. |
| Kansas | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Kansas law prohibits knowingly placing a sports wager as an agent or proxy for another person. The offence can carry criminal penalties. |
| Kentucky | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Kentucky sportsbook controls must include procedures designed to prevent people from placing wagers as agents or proxies for others. |
| Louisiana | Limited restriction | Louisiana law specifically prohibits a prohibited bettor from using another person to place wagers and prohibits others from facilitating such betting. |
| Maine | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Maine law prohibits an operator from accepting a wager from someone acting on behalf of, or as an agent or custodian for, another person. |
| Maryland | Limited restriction | Under current Maryland regulations, a sportsbook may not accept a wager it knew or should have known was placed on behalf of, or for the benefit of, a person prohibited from sports wagering. The rule does not create a blanket prohibition covering every wager placed for another eligible bettor. |
| Massachusetts | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Massachusetts law requires operators to use reasonable methods to stop people from wagering as agents or proxies for others. |
| Michigan | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Michigan's internet sports betting rules include people wagering on behalf of another person among prohibited participants. |
| Mississippi | Limited restriction | Mississippi Gaming Commission rules bar sportsbooks from knowingly accepting a wager when a person is betting for another for compensation. I did not find an equivalent blanket rule covering every unpaid proxy wager. |
| Missouri | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Missouri's sports wagering rules state that an individual may not place a wager on behalf of another person. |
| Montana | Official sportsbook restriction | Montana Lottery's official sports betting rules restrict a person from wagering on the account of, or for, another person. |
| Nebraska | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Nebraska law includes a person placing a sports wager as an agent or proxy among prohibited participants. |
| Nevada | Limited restriction | Nevada law contains an exception for certain wagers placed without compensation for the benefit of another person, while Nevada Gaming Regulation 22 treats compensated messenger betting separately. |
| New Hampshire | Limited restriction | New Hampshire expressly covers people acting as agents or proxies for prohibited sports bettors. The rule is narrower than a blanket ban covering every eligible bettor. |
| New Jersey | Explicit rule against proxy betting | New Jersey rules prohibit sportsbooks from knowingly accepting wagers made on behalf of another person or through another person's account. |
| New Mexico | Varies by tribal sportsbook | Sports betting is offered through tribal gaming rather than one statewide commercial sportsbook system. The New Mexico Gaming Control Board explains that Tribal Gaming Agencies regulate tribal casino operations. I found no uniform public proxy rule applying to every tribal sportsbook. |
| New York | Explicit rule against proxy betting | New York's sports wagering framework includes people betting as agents or proxies among prohibited participants. |
| North Carolina | Explicit rule against proxy betting | North Carolina's current rules define an individual wagering on behalf of another individual or person as an Ineligible Person. Operators must use reasonable measures to prevent Ineligible Persons from wagering. |
| North Dakota | Varies by tribal sportsbook | Sports betting operates through tribal casinos. Dakota Nation Sportsbook, for example, expressly prohibits a person from placing wagers or collecting winnings as an agent or proxy. That rule should not be applied automatically to every tribal sportsbook in the state. |
| Ohio | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Ohio law requires sportsbook operators to use reasonable methods to prevent people from wagering on behalf of another person. |
| Oregon | Official sportsbook restriction | The Oregon Lottery offers sports betting through DraftKings. The Oregon-specific DraftKings terms prohibit another person from using the account and restrict using a single account on behalf of multiple entrants. |
| Pennsylvania | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Pennsylvania's sports wagering rules expressly cover wagers made on behalf of another person and other forms of proxy wagering. |
| Rhode Island | Official sportsbook restriction | Rhode Island Lottery rules state that wagers are accepted from the player placing them, not on behalf of another person or entity. I would not turn this wording into a claim that every proxy wager is separately criminalised. |
| South Dakota | Explicit rule against proxy betting | South Dakota law prohibits sportsbooks from accepting wagers from agents or proxies for other people. Violations can carry criminal penalties. |
| Tennessee | Explicit rule against proxy betting | The Tennessee Sports Wagering Council states directly that betting on behalf of another person is illegal in Tennessee. |
| Vermont | Limited restriction | Vermont law includes a person acting as an agent or proxy for a prohibited sports bettor among prohibited participants. |
| Virginia | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Virginia requires operators to take reasonable measures to prevent one sports bettor from acting as a proxy for another. |
| Washington | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Washington's tribal sports-wagering framework includes people wagering as agents or proxies among prohibited participants. |
| West Virginia | Explicit rule against proxy betting | West Virginia regulations include people attempting to wager as agents or proxies among prohibited sports-pool participants. |
| Wisconsin | Varies by tribal sportsbook | Wisconsin's Department of Administration says legal sports betting is limited to tribal gaming authorised under compacts. Individual tribal sportsbook rules apply. Potawatomi Sportsbook, for example, expressly prohibits wagering as an agent or proxy. |
| Wyoming | Explicit rule against proxy betting | Wyoming's sports wagering rules prohibit people from wagering on behalf of another person. |
| Washington, D.C. | Explicit rule against proxy betting | D.C. law requires operators to use reasonable methods to prevent individuals or groups from wagering as agents or proxies for others. |
The table shows why I do not use a simple legal-or-illegal classification. Nevada is the clearest example. Under NRS 465.094, certain wagers placed without compensation for another person's benefit can fall within an exception. Nevada Gaming Regulation 22 treats compensated messenger betting separately.
The consequences can also go beyond sportsbook account action. Kansas and South Dakota attach criminal penalties to certain forms of proxy wagering, while Tennessee expressly states that betting on behalf of another person is illegal.
New Jersey also shows that proxy-betting rules are enforced against operators. In February 2022, the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement imposed a $150,000 civil penalty on DraftKings after finding that the operator had negligently allowed a patron to engage in proxy wagering. The enforcement summary and official order provide the details.
Proxy Betting in the UK
There is no general rule in the UK that prohibits every case of one person placing a bet for another. The legal position changes when the arrangement becomes a service or involves other regulated activity.
Under Section 13 of the Gambling Act 2005, a person who provides a service designed to facilitate bets between other people can be treated as a betting intermediary. The UK Gambling Commission explains that this can include a tipster who places bets for third parties in return for payment or commission. The appropriate operating licence is required for this type of business.
Online accounts are also subject to regulatory controls. UK-licensed remote operators must identify their customers, and the Gambling Commission warns against giving personal details to third parties for gambling accounts, particularly where this could bypass age checks, self-exclusion or other restrictions.
Sportsbooks can then impose additional account rules. I compare the terms of four major British operators below.
Sportsbook Rules Add a Second Layer
Gambling rules are only one part of the picture. Sportsbooks also set their own account rules. Even where I found no broad legal ban on every form of proxy betting, an operator may still require the registered customer to place only their own bets.
Proxy betting can affect several controls used by sportsbooks:
| Control | Why Proxy Betting Can Create a Problem |
|---|---|
| Identity and age checks | The person behind the wager may not be the verified customer |
| Location checks | The real bettor and the person placing the wager may be in different jurisdictions |
| Self-exclusion | An excluded person may try to continue gambling through someone else |
| Source of funds | Money used through the account may belong to another person |
| Account security | Someone other than the registered customer may access or control the account |
| Sports integrity | A restricted or prohibited person may try to place wagers through another bettor |
How US Sportsbooks Treat Betting for Someone Else
I checked official material from four major US sportsbooks.
Because operator terms can differ by state, the source checked matters.
| Sportsbook | Source Checked | What the Rule or Policy Says |
|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | Pennsylvania Terms of Use | Another person cannot access or use the account. The terms also cover placing a bet through the service on behalf of another individual. |
| FanDuel | Identity-verification policy | FanDuel says it monitors for possible underage and proxy betting and can close accounts when prohibited activity is identified. |
| Caesars Sportsbook | Pennsylvania terms | Caesars includes proxy wagering among conduct that can lead to account action. |
| bet365 | US Terms and Conditions | The account must be used for the customer's own personal betting. The terms restrict using an account for the benefit of or on behalf of a third party. |
The wording differs between operators. DraftKings directly covers wagers placed on behalf of another person, while FanDuel also describes proxy betting as activity it monitors.
I therefore checked terms for broader phrases such as personal use, third-party benefit and acting on behalf of another person, not only the word proxy.
Some operators also have narrow approved exceptions. Caesars' Massachusetts rules, for example, describe a formal process for assistance for certain customers with disabilities. The bettor must be present and the procedure must be approved. I would not treat this as ordinary proxy betting.
How Great Britain Sportsbooks Treat Betting for Someone Else
I checked four large sports betting sites in the UK.
| Sportsbook | What the Terms Say |
|---|---|
| William Hill | The account is for the customer's own personal use. Another person cannot use or deposit into it. The terms also restrict money provided by another person when it is used to bypass restrictions or suspension on that person's account. |
| bet365 | An account cannot be used for the benefit of or on behalf of a third party. Customers also cannot allow another person to use the account, apart from limited operator-approved assistance. |
| Sky Bet | Bets through the account must be for the customer's own benefit unless Sky Bet has agreed otherwise in advance. |
| Paddy Power | Customers confirm that the account is for personal use and that they will not act on behalf of a third party. Accounts cannot be sold or transferred. |
William Hill also shows that proxy-betting rules can apply without password sharing, because its terms cover certain third-party funds used to bypass account restrictions.
What Can Happen If Proxy Betting Is Detected?
There is no universal penalty. The response depends on the sportsbook's terms, the jurisdiction and what the operator believes happened.
| Possible Action | What It Can Mean |
|---|---|
| Account review | The sportsbook may request more identity, payment or source-of-funds information |
| Temporary suspension | The customer may lose access while the operator investigates |
| Bet cancellation | Pending or affected wagers may be voided where the terms allow it |
| Account closure | The operator may permanently terminate the account |
| Withholding relevant funds | Some terms allow winnings linked to prohibited activity to be withheld in defined circumstances |
DraftKings, William Hill and bet365 publish terms allowing some of these actions, although the exact conditions differ.
I would not assume that a sportsbook will automatically confiscate all winnings after suspected proxy betting. The outcome depends on the operator's terms and the facts of the case.
Proxy Betting and Self-Exclusion
Proxy betting can be used to bypass self-exclusion by hiding the excluded bettor behind another person.
There is evidence that this happens in real betting environments. A 2025 study of current and former UK betting-shop employees described situations where excluded customers could remain outside a shop and pass bets to another person going inside.
The study was qualitative and focused on betting shops, so I would not use it to estimate how common online proxy betting is. It does show a real way in which another person can be used to bypass an exclusion.
Broader research on self-exclusion systems has also identified breaches and circumvention as problems that regulators and operators need to address.
I would not treat betting through another person as an alternative to self-exclusion. It removes part of the protection that self-exclusion is designed to provide.
Final Thoughts
Proxy betting is not one single practice with one legal answer. An unpaid bet for another person, paid messenger betting and using someone else’s sportsbook account can be treated differently depending on the jurisdiction and the circumstances.
The rules I reviewed in the US and the UK also show that gambling law is only part of the picture. Sportsbooks can impose their own account restrictions, including rules on third-party betting, account sharing and the source of funds.
Before placing a bet for someone else, I would check both the local rules and the sportsbook’s current terms. This is especially important when account restrictions, third-party funds or self-exclusion are involved.
Related articles
Any Other Score Bet: Meaning, Examples and How It Works
Granular Betting (1st Drive Result)
